Fraud Claims Part 3 - Burdens of Proof | Katz Melinger PLLC
Katz Melinger PLLC
Free Initial Phone Consultation
Menu Contact
Free Initial Phone Consultation
Proactive. Pragmatic.
Committed To Obtaining Results.

Fraud Claims Part 3 - Burdens of Proof

Fraud Claims Part 3 - Burdens of Proof by Kenneth Katz

Burdens of proof in voidable transaction claims differ from other types of cases because direct evidence can be elusive. In these cases, what can a creditor use as evidence that will be sufficient to prove that a voidable transaction has occured?

Typically, a plaintiff alleging fraud must draft the complaint to include very specific allegations, describing in detail exactly what happened and how the plaintiff was harmed by the defendant's acts or omissions. However, in voidable transaction cases, courts recognize that the creditor may not have access to critical details such as when certain transfers were made; how much money was involved; or exactly what property was transferred and to whom. Since most debtors are either individuals or private entities, creditors are unlikely to have access to the debtor's communications, receipts, or other records that could verify the creditor's allegations. Recognizing this inherent issue in claims involving voidable transactions, a creditor alleging a claim of fraud against a debtor need only plead general facts to support the claim.

For instance, rather than having to plead something as specific as "On January 1, 2017, the debtor transferred $28,000 to his wife," a creditor can simply allege that the debtor transferred assets to his wife after the judgment was entered. While more details could certainly strengthen the claim, something less specific can often be enough to survive a motion to dismiss and allow the case to proceed through discovery.

After stating a claim, the creditor must then prove the voidable transaction by a preponderance of the evidence. Knowing the difficulties creditors may face, courts only require creditors to produce enough evidence to show that a voidable transaction likely occurred. If a creditor can identify the property that was moved and demonstrate when it was moved, to whom it was moved, and that it was moved to an insider (a family member or affiliated entity) or that the transfer was otherwise made without reasonably equivalent value in return, the courts will shift the burden to the debtor to prove that the transfer was not fraudulent.

Cases involving actual fraud are different. Since the damages and penalties involved are greater, courts impose a higher standard of proof for claims of actual fraud than constructive fraud. While creditors need only prove claims of constructive fraud by a preponderance of the evidence, creditors alleging actual fraud must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the debtor engaged in the transfer of assets with the intent to defraud.

Proving actual fraud can be challenging. Depositions and document discovery may fill in some details, but may not be enough to prove intent. People rarely state in writing that they planned to transfer assets to avoid paying their debts, and debtors likely won't admit as much during a deposition. These issues, plus the higher burden of proof, make cases of actual fraud particularly difficult for creditors.

In our next post, we will discuss what forms of relief courts can offer creditors if they suspect that the debtor is fraudulently disposing assets during a lawsuit or after a judgment is entered.

NOTE: This post has been amended to reflect the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, which went into effect April 3, 2020.

Kenneth J Katz.jpgKenneth J. Katz
Email us

Don't miss an update! Sign up for our newsletter here.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Schedule Your Consultation Today

To begin protecting your legal rights and financial interests, schedule an initial consultation. We clearly communicate your legal options in an honest manner.

Contact Katz Melinger PLLC at 212-460-0047 or reach us by filling out the form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Office Address

Katz Melinger PLLC
280 Madison Avenue
Suite 600
New York, NY 10016

Phone: 212-460-0047
Fax: 212-428-6811
New York Law Office Map

Review Us

Can we help you find a topic?