9th Circuit: Salary history doesn't justify gender gap in pay | Katz Melinger PLLC
Katz Melinger PLLC
Free Initial Phone Consultation
212-460-0047
Menu Contact
Free Initial Phone Consultation
212-460-0047
Proactive. Pragmatic.
Committed To Obtaining Results.

9th Circuit: Salary history doesn't justify gender gap in pay

AdobeStock_72205790.jpegAccording to the Pew Research Center, an average woman working in the United States makes about 82 cents for every dollar a male peer makes for doing the same work. Some of that pay gap can be explained by differences in choice of occupation, educational attainment, or work experience, but the majority of the gap is likely the result of gender discrimination.

One of the problems that women face in attaining more equitable pay is that any pay disparity in earlier jobs can continue to depress their wages over a lifetime. This is because many, if not most, employers base new hires' pay in part on their salary history. If a woman receives lower pay in an earlier job -- whether due to bias or not -- that lower pay can be reflected in a lower salary at every subsequent job. An early salary disparity between men and women could thus lead to an enormous pay gap over the course of a career.

If setting a new hire's pay based on her salary history serves to perpetuate an existing gender-based pay gap, should doing so be considered gender discrimination? The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that it should. The court held that the practice violates the federal Equal Pay Act.

In the case before the court, an Arizona teacher was hired as a math consultant by the Fresno Office of Education. Her salary was set by district policy at 5 percent above her previous salary. She later discovered that male consultants were paid more than she was and sued for gender discrimination. The district argued that its policy was gender-neutral.

"To accept the county's argument would be to perpetuate rather than eliminate the pervasive discrimination at which the [Equal Pay Act] was aimed," wrote the 9th Circuit.

New York is in the 2nd Circuit, so the court's ruling doesn't apply in our state. However, New York City prohibits employers from asking applicants about their salary histories, and New York State may soon follow suit. This appears to be a trend, as other states and cities, including California, Oregon, and Philadelphia, have also passed similar laws.

If you were asked about your salary history while applying for a job, or suspect that your salary history was used to justify paying you less than your male co-workers, consult an employment law attorney about your situation. 

Want more timely employment law updates? Sign up for our newsletter.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Schedule Your Consultation Today

To begin protecting your legal rights and financial interests, schedule an initial consultation. We clearly communicate your legal options in an honest manner.

Contact Katz Melinger PLLC at 212-460-0047 or reach us by filling out the form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Office Address

Katz Melinger PLLC
280 Madison Avenue
Suite 600
New York, NY 10016

Phone: 212-460-0047
Fax: 212-428-6811
New York Employment Law Office

Review Us
CLOSE WINDOW  X

Can we help you find a topic?