Pair of judgments rule on class action waivers | Katz Melinger PLLC
Katz Melinger PLLC
Free Initial Phone Consultation
Menu Contact
Free Initial Phone Consultation
Proactive. Pragmatic.
Committed To Obtaining Results.

Pair of judgments rule on class action waivers

A pair of recent rulings in California could mean significant changes for employment agreements. The debate is over the enforceability of class action waivers in employment contracts.

Two separate decisions, one by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and one by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) determined that class action waivers are unenforceable.

The most recent decision by the NLRB involved a former grocery store employee's wage and hour claim against the grocery store's operator. The company demanded the claim be brought to arbitration, but the NLRB determined that the arbitration clause in the employment contract violated the National Labor Relations Act. Although the arbitration provision did not explicitly reference class actions, the judge ruled that the wording required employers to "relinquish any right they have to resolve such disputes through collective or class action."

Ultimately, the judge determined the clause was unenforceable because it did not clarify whether the arbitration provision was optional or mandatory.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the second case days before the grocery store decision. Similarly, the question before the Court was over arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit case involved an employee incentive agreement which required the employee's claims to go to arbitration and included a judicial carve-out that allowed the employer's claims to be brought to court. The incentive agreement also prohibited class actions and stated that if portions of the contract were found unenforceable, they could be severed from the rest of the contract.

The Court ruled the judicial carve-out was procedurally unconscionable and that the class action waiver was unenforceable. In addressing the enforceability of the contract as a whole, the court determined the unenforceable provisions could be severed, rather than voiding the entire contract.

These are two interesting cases. Employment contracts are complex, and employees don't always understand what they are signing. These cases highlight an important topic worth monitoring, as similar cases will be heard by the Supreme Court later this year.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Schedule Your Consultation Today

To begin protecting your legal rights and financial interests, schedule an initial consultation. We clearly communicate your legal options in an honest manner.

Contact Katz Melinger PLLC at 212-460-0047 or reach us by filling out the form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Office Address

Katz Melinger PLLC
280 Madison Avenue
Suite 600
New York, NY 10016

Phone: 212-460-0047
Fax: 212-428-6811
New York Law Office Map

Review Us

Can we help you find a topic?